Movie+RubricAK 

Evaluate your own work. Indicate with bold text what your rating is for each of the categories and explain your rating.
 * || 4 = Distinguished || 3 = Accomplished || 2 = Developing || 1 = Beginning ||
 * Knowledge gained by viewers || The story taught everyone something. Viewers were entertained and informed. || Mostly educational with a few instances that didn't apply or fit with the theme. || Had portions that were good, Mostly random shots with little educational value || Goofed around with the camera. random shots that do not focus around a theme. ||
 * Camera Techniques || Outstanding camera work. Varying use of shots and angles that impact look of project. || Video is focused and steady. A variety of camera techniques implemented throughout project. || Camera is occasionally out of focus or shaky. Techniques distract from the project. || Camera out of focus or shaky. Little attention paid to camera's relation to subject. ||
 * Audio/Sound || Audio is flawless; excellent balance of sound, music and ambient noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound. || Important sounds and dialogue are captured. Continuity in audio playback and integration of ambient noise/music. || Audio occasionally inaudible and/or lacks continuity. An attempt is made to ensure that quality dialogue is captured. || Little attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Audio inaudible or inappropriate. ||
 * Editing || Project flows exceptionally well. Transitions are creative and editing is of the highest quality. || Edits are unnoticeable. Transitions are not overused and reflect signs of creativity in their usage. || Edits inconsistent and/or distracting at times. Use of transitions is abrupt. || Few to no transitions. No Edits. Unnatural breaks in audio/video that distract. ||
 * Resources || All resources used are listed in the credits || Most of the resources are listed || Resources difficult to find or do not exist || No resources listed ||
 * Teamwork || The group had a superior group performance || Group work well together with equal participation || Unequal work-participants didn’t work as a team. || Group members did little or no work on the project ||

Eye of the Editor- Compare and contrast.


 * 1) How is your story similar or different then the others of the group?
 * In my movie my movie is about understanding each others, and making a difference on other people. Telling them something nice, or if we see them doing something bad, or not good try to correct them, and tell them how to do it right.**


 * 1) What techniques did you use or did members of your group use to change the story?
 * We used different kind of techniques, for my I edited some of the video that we all did and I try to make it shorter or longer so it wouldn't be the same as the others on my group. We also have different title and we have different styles on the videos. We have different minutes, on my video mine appears to be short, but my minutes are longer not that longer but it's pretty good. **

Describe how the editor can control and manipulate the final version of the story to change the message to change the emphasis?


 * The final version of my video is different then the others on my group,.**