Movie+Rubric+PP

Based on rubric at http://brunkerb.wikispaces.com/Video+Production+Rubric+part+1

Evaluate your own work. Indicate with bold text what your rating is for each of the categories and explain your rating.
 * || 4 = Distinguished || 3 = Accomplished || 2 = Developing || 1 = Beginning ||
 * Knowledge gained by viewers || **The story taught everyone something. Viewers were entertained and informed.**
 * The story behind my video is well explained, and it contains great examples and explanations. || Mostly educational with a few instances that didn't apply or fit with the theme. || Had portions that were good, Mostly random shots with little educational value || Goofed around with the camera. random shots that do not focus around a theme. ||
 * Camera Techniques || Outstanding camera work. Varying use of shots and angles that impact look of project. || **Video is focused and steady. A variety of camera techniques implemented throughout project.**
 * The filming might have been better if it were filmed horizontally. Also, it was a little shaky but the overall product was good. || Camera is occasionally out of focus or shaky. Techniques distract from the project. || Camera out of focus or shaky. Little attention paid to camera's relation to subject. ||
 * Audio/Sound || **Audio is flawless; excellent balance of sound, music and ambient noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound.**
 * There is great sound quality, and all transitions contain music. There were a few sound problems that were removed before the final product was released. || Important sounds and dialogue are captured. Continuity in audio playback and integration of ambient noise/music. || Audio occasionally inaudible and/or lacks continuity. An attempt is made to ensure that quality dialogue is captured. || Little attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Audio inaudible or inappropriate. ||
 * Editing || **Project flows exceptionally well. Transitions are creative and editing is of the highest quality.**
 * I believe the editing used for my video is very well designed, and I believe it's creative and connects the film clips together well. || Edits are unnoticeable. Transitions are not overused and reflect signs of creativity in their usage. || Edits inconsistent and/or distracting at times. Use of transitions is abrupt. || Few to no transitions. No Edits. Unnatural breaks in audio/video that distract. ||
 * Resources || **All resources used are listed in the credits** || Most of the resources are listed || Resources difficult to find or do not exist || No resources listed ||
 * Teamwork || **The group had a superior group performance**
 * All members of our film team got along and everyone made great contributions towards the final film clips. || Group work well together with equal participation || Unequal work-participants didn’t work as a team. || Group members did little or no work on the project ||

Eye of the Editor - Compare and Contrast:
 * 1) How is your story similar or different from the stories in the movies of your group?
 * 2) Considering we all used relatively the same video clips I believe the stories were similar. However, We all had different spins on the idea behind the foundation making each video unique.
 * 3) What techniques did you use or did members of your group use to change the story?
 * 4) The group agreed to make the video a short Q&A, which I believe makes the film flow nicely. All the members used different themes and transition clips which makes the stories different.
 * 5) Describe how the editor can control and manipulate the final version of the story to change the message or to change the emphasis.
 * 6) The editing done on each video clip makes the viewer have many different views on the final product. The editing each member had made each person's take on the video clips unique.