Movie+rubric+MG 

Based on rubric at http://brunkerb.wikispaces.com/Video+Production+Rubric+part+1


 * Evaluate your own work. Indicate with bold text what your rating is for each of the categories and explain your rating. **
 * || **4 = Distinguished** || **3 = Accomplished** || **2 = Developing ** || **1 = Beginning ** ||
 * Knowledge gained by viewers || ** The story taught everyone something. Viewers were entertained and informed. **
 * We taught about bullying and we showed what it is and how serious it can be. We also showed how someone can really make a difference. || ** Mostly educational with a few instances that didn't apply or fit with the theme. ** || Had portions that were good, Mostly random shots with little educational value || Goofed around with the camera. random shots that do not focus around a theme. ||
 * Camera Techniques || **Outstanding camera work. Varying use of shots and angles that impact look of project.**
 * There were several different angles in this movie. I told the camera man where to stand and how to stand basically. I made the angles fit the seine properly. || Video is focused and steady. A variety of camera techniques implemented throughout project. || Camera is occasionally out of focus or shaky. Techniques distract from the project. || Camera out of focus or shaky. Little attention paid to camera's relation to subject. ||
 * Audio/Sound || ** Audio is flawless; excellent balance of sound, music and ambient noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound. **
 * I avoided using music at all because it wasn't cooperating and I sacrificed so that you could hear the people. || Important sounds and dialogue are captured. Continuity in audio playback and integration of ambient noise/music. || Audio occasionally inaudible and/or lacks continuity. An attempt is made to ensure that quality dialogue is captured. || Little attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Audio inaudible or inappropriate. ||
 * Editing || ** Project flows exceptionally well. Transitions are creative and editing is of the highest quality. **
 * I did the best I could with this website. || ** Edits are unnoticeable. Transitions are not overused and reflect signs of creativity in their usage. ** || Edits inconsistent and/or distracting at times. Use of transitions is abrupt. || Few to no transitions. No Edits. Unnatural breaks in audio/video that distract. ||
 * Resources || ** All resources used are listed in the credits **
 * We didn't have any resources. || Most of the resources are listed || Resources difficult to find or do not exist || No resources listed ||
 * Teamwork || T**he group had a superior group performance**
 * We all worked together and thought out a very well planned movie and made it happen. || Group work well together with equal participation || Unequal work-participants didn’t work as a team. || Group members did little or no work on the project ||


 * Eye of the Editor - Compare and Contrast ** :
 * 1) How is your story similar or different from the stories in the movies of your group?


 * Since I had a lot of speaking parts, i knew from the start where I wanted these pieces to go and why. I edited differently from other group members. I tried to have music in the background to make it more emotional but unfortunately the cite wasn't permitting it correctly.
 * 1) What techniques did you use or did members of your group use to change the story?


 * The transitions from one slide to another make a difference because they make the story more interested. I put the videos in the order I did to almost make a climax. I wanted the bullying to get worse and worse before it got better. I wanted a build up to show what really happens in bullying and how serious it is. I did that.
 * 1) Describe how the editor can control and manipulate the final version of the story to change the message or to change the emphasis.
 * The editor could play different types of music to show the feeling of the video. The editor could make different focus spots by text. They can make the transitions different like i did. The editor could also put different filters and could focus on more serious topics.