Letter2ICS16CAB

Dear Luke S. Walker,

My team has reviewed the new telescopes and we have made some new conclusions about how we should rate the space telescopes. My partner and I came up that Precision spectroscope-2 because the spectroscope range is very large and that's what I look for in a space telescope. Advanced spectroscope-2 is the second best space telescope because the em field range is the largest and it can see UV, VL, IN, MW and RW so you can detect many different things about space objects. The third best telescope, in my opinion, is the Extended time-3 because the em field range is large and it has a long viewing time so you can observe planetary objects for a long time. The fifth best space telescope is the Massive duration-8 because the viewing time is amazing but the spectrograph range is small. The sixth best space telescope is Wide Field-1, this is my opinion because the spectrograph range is average but the field of view and the max viewing time is great. The forth best telescope is the High Resolution-4, this is my perspective because the resolution is amazing and everything else is just average but the resolution is so great that it isn't in last place.The Precision Spectroscope, in my opinion is the second worst because most of the specs that I care about are just average or bad. The Target Acquisition-5 is the worst telescope,in my opinion because all of the stats that I think matter are either average or below average. The way that I ranked these telescopes is I looked at the spectrograph range and found the best one and then, since most of the other spectrograph ranges are similar, i looked at the focus time and subtracted it from the total viewing time and ranked them that way. Thank you for reading this and considering my way of ranking space telescopes. Good luck on ranking your other telescopes.

Sincerely, ICS16CAB