Movie+Rubric+OJ

Based on rubric at http://brunkerb.wikispaces.com/Video+Production+Rubric+part+1

Evaluate your own work. Indicate with bold text what your rating is for each of the categories and explain your rating.
 * || 4 = Distinguished || 3 = Accomplished || 2 = Developing || 1 = Beginning ||
 * Knowledge gained by viewers || =The story taught everyone something. Viewers were entertained and informed.=

It is a very important message. Also it teaches people not to be bystanders. || Mostly educational with a few instances that didn't apply or fit with the theme. || Had portions that were good, Mostly random shots with little educational value || Goofed around with the camera. random shots that do not focus around a theme. ||
 * Camera Techniques || Outstanding camera work. Varying use of shots and angles that impact look of project. || =Video is focused and steady. A variety of camera techniques implemented throughout project.=

We don's use a lot of angles and techniques but we do use a variety of them. || Camera is occasionally out of focus or shaky. Techniques distract from the project. || Camera out of focus or shaky. Little attention paid to camera's relation to subject. ||
 * Audio/Sound || Audio is flawless; excellent balance of sound, music and ambient noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound. || =Important sounds and dialogue are captured. Continuity in audio playback and integration of ambient noise/music.=

You can hear all of the dialogue. Except on one part where you hear trucks and cars drive by. || Audio occasionally inaudible and/or lacks continuity. An attempt is made to ensure that quality dialogue is captured. || Little attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Audio inaudible or inappropriate. ||
 * Editing || =Project flows exceptionally well. Transitions are creative and editing is of the highest quality.=

I think I did very well editing the movie. || Edits are unnoticeable. Transitions are not overused and reflect signs of creativity in their usage. || Edits inconsistent and/or distracting at times. Use of transitions is abrupt. || Few to no transitions. No Edits. Unnatural breaks in audio/video that distract. ||
 * Resources || =All resources used are listed in the credits=

I didn't use any credits therefore they are all listed. || Most of the resources are listed || Resources difficult to find or do not exist || No resources listed ||
 * Teamwork || =The group had a superior group performance=

We never argued and worked together very well. || Group work well together with equal participation || Unequal work-participants didn’t work as a team. || Group members did little or no work on the project ||

Eye of the Editor - Compare and Contrast:
 * 1) How is your story similar or different from the stories in the movies of your group? My story is very similar to those in my group. The meaning doesn't change. I used more text then the others in my group though. I used different transitions then the others. Also everyone put their videos in different orders.
 * 2) What techniques did you use or did members of your group use to change the story? I used more text then the others. But the story itself never really changed. In all of them there is a kid getting bullied, then someone standing up to the bully.
 * 3) Describe how the editor can control and manipulate the final version of the story to change the message or to change the emphasis. The editor can use many different techniques to manipulate the story. To change the story all you would have to do is rearrange the videos. For example, if you put standing up to the bully before the bullying it wouldn't have made sense.