SPACETELESCOPELETTER1CS16ALV

Dear Luke S. Walker,

We got your message that you would want us to review 5 telescope models. Therefore we will give you our final results, fully aware that this is to understand which is the best for the widest variety of missions. I will put the table of my partner and I's work, and please tell me if you agree or disagree. We understand that the lowest rating for these telescopes means that they are the best, and the highest means that it is the worst of the five listed. Therefore, we have come up with the conclusion that target acquisition has received the lowest, rating therefore making it the best of the five, with a rating of 2.4. The telescope with the highest rating is the high resolution telescope, with a rating of 3.6. Since we are listing the telescopes and their rating, why not list the runner ups? So, the lowest is target acquisition, the 2nd best was wide field with 2.6, the 3rd best is advance spectroscope with a 3, the 4th best is extended time with 3.2, and of course, high resolution has been classified with a 3.6 rating.

Sincerely,

ICS16ALV
 * || Resolution || Spectrograph Range || Field of View || Time to Focus || Max Viewing Time || Overall Rating ||
 * Wide Field || 2 || 2 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 2.6 ||
 * Advanced Spectroscope || 5 || 1 || 4 || 2 || 3 || 3 ||
 * Extended Time || 4 || 3 || 3 || 5 || 1 || 3.2 ||
 * High Resolution || 1 || 5 || 4 || 3 || 5 || 3.6 ||
 * Target Acquisition || 3 || 4 || 2 || 1 || 2 || 2.4 ||