Movie+Rubric

Based on rubric at http://brunkerb.wikispaces.com/Video+Production+Rubric+part+1


 * Evaluate your own work. Indicate with bold text what your rating is for each of the categories and explain your rating.**


 * Eye of the Editor - Compare and Contrast**:
 * 1) How is your story similar or different from the stories in the movies of your group?
 * 2) What techniques did you use or did members of your group use to change the story?
 * 3) Describe how the editor can control and manipulate the final version of the story to change the message or to change the emphasis.


 * Requirements: **
 * 1) ** 1. ** ** Teams may film together but each student must edit to create their own version of the film. **
 * 2) ** 2. ** ** Do not publish without permission. **
 * || ** 4 = Distinguished ** || ** 3 = Accomplished ** || ** 2 = Developing ** || ** 1 = Beginning ** ||
 * Knowledge gained by viewers || The story taught everyone something. Viewers were entertained and informed. || Mostly educational with a few instances that didn't apply or fit with the theme. || Mostly random shots that did not tell a story or did little to support the theme. || Goofed around with the camera. random shots that do not focus around a theme. ||
 * Camera Techniques || Outstanding camera work. Varying use of shots and angles that impact look of project. || Video is focused and steady. A variety of camera techniques implemented throughout project. || Camera is occasionally out of focus or shaky. Techniques distract from the project. || Camera out of focus or shaky. Little attention paid to camera's relation to subject. ||
 * Audio/Sound || Audio is flawless; excellent balance of sound, music and ambient noise. Every precaution was taken to collect ideal sound. || Important sounds and dialogue are captured. Continuity in audio playback and integration of ambient noise/music. || Audio occasionally inaudible and/or lacks continuity. An attempt is made to ensure that quality dialogue is captured. || Little attention was paid to ensuring quality sound during the shoot. Audio inaudible or inappropriate. ||
 * Editing || Project flows exceptionally well. Transitions are creative and editing is of the highest quality. || Edits are unnoticeable. Transitions are not overused and reflect signs of creativity in their usage. || Edits inconsistent and/or distracting at times. Use of transitions is abrupt. || Few to no transitions. No Edits. Unnatural breaks in audio/video that distract. ||
 * Teamwork || The group had a superior group performance to film the project || Group work well together with equal participation to film the project || Unequal work-participants didn’t work as a team to film the project || Group members did little or no work on the project to film the project ||