Elephants+and+WolvesGA

Research and Information Fluency: Students apply digital tools to gather, evaluate, and use information.

 * 1) Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media
 * 2) Evaluate and select information sources and digital tools based on the appropriateness to specific tasks.
 * 3) Process data and report results

CC ELA Literacy:
 * 1) Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively and orally.
 * 2) Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners (readers) can follow the line of reasoning.
 * 3) Acquire and use accurately a range of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases sufficient for reading and writing.

You've read the eBook Elephants Under Pressure on Myon and you've watched Assignment America.
 * 1) Which gave you more detailed and fact-based information about elephants and elephant society? Justify your answer with examples.
 * 2) Which was the most successful in helping you to understand animal relationships? Justify your answer with examples.

Resource Image for information below:


 * [[image:icsmedialiteracy/450px-TrophicWeb.jpg caption="450px-TrophicWeb.jpg"]] ||
 * A trophic pyramid (a) and a simplified community food web (b) illustrating ecological relations among creatures that are typical of a northern terrestrial ecosystem. Names of trophic categories are shown to the right of the pyramid. Ecological trophic pyramids are typically one of three kinds: 1) pyramid of numbers, 2) pyramid of biomass, or 3) pyramid of energy. ||

image from: []

Watch the video How Wolves Change Rivers. (see below)

 * 1) Discuss answers to the following questions as a group: (1) What is a trophic cascade? (2) What is a food chain? (3) How long had the wolves been absent from Yellowstone? (4) Without wolves, how did the increasing deer population affect the ecology of Yellowstone? (5) How did the deer react when the wolves were reintroduced? (6) What does "regenerate" mean? What caused the trees to begin to regenerate? (7) What helped the beaver population to increase? (8) What is a "niche"? How did the increasing beaver population create additional niches? (9) How did this trophic cascade cause the rivers to become more stable? Provide specific examples of the changes to the rivers and river banks.
 * 2) Discuss in groups how the photography and sound tract help to support the scientific information and help to develop a deeper understanding of factors that influence the ecology of the area.
 * 3) Who created this video? What is the producer's academic background for work? What is the source of the information?

==Read Has the Reintroduction of Wolves Really Saved Yellowstone. from the Popular Science website (See text below)==
 * 1) Discuss answers to the following questions as a group: (1) With the wolves absent from Yellowstone park, what happened to the elk population? (2) How did the elk population affect the trees, especially the willow trees? (3) What is a food web? Why is the wolf an "apex predator" in a food web? (4) What is one of the main animals that wolves eat? (5) Why are the willows in some areas not recovering very fast? (6) What is one reason the beaver population decreased while the wolves were absent from the area? (7) What are other factors that might have affected the population of elks and beavers?
 * 2) Compare reading the article with watching the video. Which was easier to understand? Why?
 * 3) Who wrote this article? What is the writer's academic background for work? What is the source of the information?

Has the Reintroduction of Wolves Really Saved Yellowstone - RECENT SCIENCE SUGGESTS THAT, WHILE IMPORTANT TO RESTORING YELLOWSTONE PARK'S ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, WOLVES ARE NOT THE PRIMARY SOLUTION. LET THE FIGHTING COMMENCE. The story goes something like this: Once upon a time, we exterminated the wolves from the Rocky Mountain West, including the part that would become Yellowstone National Park. We thought this was a good idea because wolves frightened us, and also because they ate the domestic livestock we liked a lot more.

But then interest in environmental conservation took hold. Scientists discovered that without wolves present in Yellowstone to hunt and kill prey, the elk population grew so large it ate up all the young willow trees until there were none. This affected the habitat of many other animals and plants in harmful ways and the ecosystem became unbalanced. Or, as science puts it, we caused a harmful “top-down trophic cascade” by removing an apex predator, the wolf, from the food web.

It followed that returning the apex predator might right that balance; and field biologists began to find some evidence for this idea, even as popular support increased for bringing wolves back. So with conservation ethics and ecological science in pretty good alignment, we re-introduced the wolves to Yellowstone, where today they scare away the hungry elk herds from the tasty young willows. Thanks to the wolf, balance has been restored. Or not? Earlier in the week, field biologist Arthur Middleton got a big reaction from readers when he asked, “Is the wolf a real American hero?” in the opinion pages of The New York Times. “This story — that wolves fixed a broken Yellowstone by killing and frightening elk — is one of ecology’s most famous,” he wrote. “But there is a problem with the story: It’s not true.” Animated discussion ensued in the comments (which The New York Times actively curates for signal over noise), with some readers protesting that the wolves have been crucial to Yellowstone's ecological revival. “Inside Yellowstone—which is where the writer is talking about even though his research was done outside Yellowstone—elk are what wolves eat,” commented well-known conservationist Carl Safina. “As a PhD ecologist myself, it's hard to see how 60% fewer elk could affect vegetation as much as before.”
 * We now know that elk are tougher, and Yellowstone more complex, than we gave them credit for. By retelling the same old story about Yellowstone wolves, we distract attention from bigger problems, mislead ourselves about the true challenges of managing ecosystems, and add to the mythology surrounding wolves at the expense of scientific understanding.

Journalist Emma Marris, who recently wrote about wolf/ecosystem science for the journal Nature, finds that Middleton's stance aligns with a growing body of evidence. “It's an evolving understanding that started out with a really beautiful and simple story, and is just getting more complex,” says Marris, author of the book Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. “There's legitimate scientific disagreement here. But I think it can't be denied that the beauty of that story plays a role in how much attention it gets.”

Some of the recent studies suggest that trophic cascades in land-based ecosystems are more “center-out” than top-down, composed of many, many radial lines of cause and effect, continuing to change over time. This shifts our understanding of apex predators as “keystone species” whose presence makes or breaks a healthy ecosystem.

“Every population of wolves has a different, interesting story going on with them,” says Marris. 'In some places there are not enough of them, in some places people are concerned there are too many. And in some it's a question of how they're interacting with the rest of the ecosystem.” At Yellowstone, despite the re-introduction of wolves, the willows are not actually recovering as well as was hoped. One reason, Marris found, may be that wolves don't actually scare elk away from their preferred feeding areas, as earlier research suggested they might. “When elk are really hungry, they're going to take their chances with the wolves,” Marris says.

Another reason for poor willow recovery may be that the wolves came back to Yellowstone too late to affect the fate of another animal population: the beavers. “Elk populations were really high while the wolves were gone,” says Marris. “That was caused by the absence of wolves, but also presumably by human management decisions, climate, and other factors."

Elks and beavers competed for the same food: willow. The elks won, beaver numbers dropped, and so did the extent of marshy habitat. "Without beaver dams creating willow-friendly environments," Marris says, "the willows can't recover."

In reporting her article, Marris learned that beyond the pages of scientific journals, the gaps between researchers who do and don't support the apex predator theory are really fairly narrow. Generally it's accepted that there is a lot more involved in balancing an ecosystem. “But some still believe carnivores are somewhat special in their top-down effects on the ecosystem,” she says. Wolves generate a lot of emotion as well as attention because they've become a bell-weather for the fate of wilderness. “Everywhere wolves exist,” says Marris, “they tell stories about how people and wild things make peace, or don't make peace, in the 21st century.”

What's most at risk as we debate the role of wolves in the ecosystem seems to be our hope for a really straightforward story that explains what's going on around us.

For additional information read [|Wolves and Big Game FAQ] by Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife

==Create a wiki page called ElephantsWolvescodename. Copy the information below, then paste to your page. Complete the work.== > How might controlling the migration of elephants impact the environment? Justify your answer. If the elephants in Asia are to go extinct there could be a very bad trophic cascade. If they try to control the migration of elephants it could make them dioriented and not make it to the destination. This could result in something very bad.
 * 1) Apply what you have learned about the Yellowstone environment to the environment in Asia where the elephants live. Write a prediction:
 * 1) Compare and contrast the facts presented in the Yellowstone video with the facts presented in the Yellowstone news article. The video gave more facts and was more optimistic and up beat. As the news article was less optimistic.

Summary - Discuss the following: Why is important to understand

 * 1) Who created a message? So you can understand their point of view better.
 * 2) What is the target audience? So you know who likes t read the stories.
 * 3) What creative techniques can be used to attract attention? bold words or bigger fonts
 * 4) How might different people understand a message differently? Their brain worls differently
 * 5) Why is a message being sent? It makes it more meaningful.